Recent advancements have demonstrated the effectiveness of the extractor-selector (E-S) framework in edge detection (ED) tasks, which achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance in both quantitative metrics and perceptual quality. However, this method still falls short of fully exploiting the potential of feature extractors, as selectors only operate on highly compressed feature maps that lack diversity and suffer from substantial information loss. Additionally, while union training can improve perceptual quality, the highest evaluation scores are typically obtained without it, creating a trade-off between quantitative accuracy and perceptual fidelity. To address these limitations, we propose an enhanced E-S architecture, which utilizes richer, less-loss feature representations and incorporates auxiliary features during the selection process, thereby improving the effectiveness of the feature selection mechanism. Additionally, we introduce a novel loss function, the Symmetrization Weight Binary Cross-Entropy (SWBCE), which simultaneously emphasizes both the recall of edge pixels and the suppression of erroneous edge predictions, thereby enhancing the predictions both in the perceptual quality and the prediction accuracy. The effectiveness and superiority of our approaches over baseline models, the standard E-S framework, and the standard Weight Binary Cross-Entropy (WBCE) loss function are demonstrated by extensive experiments. For example, our enhanced E-S architecture trained with SWBCE loss function achieves average improvements of 8.25$\%$, 8.01$\%$, and 33.25$\%$ in ODS, OIS, and AP, measured on BIPED2 compared with the baseline models, significantly outperforming the standard E-S method. The results set new benchmarks for ED tasks, and highlight the potential of the methods in beyond.

Traditional malware detection methods rely on signatures, heuristics and behaviors [1, 2]. However, these solutions are not suitable in the long term due to the significant number of malware present in the cyberspace, and creating new rules for detection becomes an impractical and unscalable approach. As an alternative, machine learning models have demonstrated great success in various tasks, such as classification, computer vision, and anomaly detection, making them promising solutions for the future of malicious software detection. In particular, neural networks and LightGBM [3] have shown particularly encouraging results [4, 5, 6]. Such machine learning models can use static characteristics extracted from malicious files, such as imports, strings, and headers information, or dynamic characteristics, as network activity or registry modifications, collected during files execution. While these models perform well, they face the challenge of constant malware evolution.

Entropy, Cross-entropy, Binary Cross-entropy, and Categorical Cross-entropy are crucial concepts in Deep Learning and one of the main loss functions used to build Neural Networks. All of them derive from the same concept: Entropy, which may be familiar to you from physics and chemistry. However, not many courses or articles explain the terms in-depth, since it requires some time and mathematics to do it correctly. In the first post, I presented three different but related conceptions of entropy and where its formula derives from. However, there is still one key concept to address, since Deep Learning does not use Entropy but a close relative of it called Cross-entropy.

Image Classification helps us to classify what is contained in an image. The goal is to answer "is there a cat in this image?", Object Detection specifies the location of objects in the image. The goal is to identify "where is the cat in this image?", Image Segmentation creates a pixel-wise mask of each object in the images.